How to Double Your Profits Whether the Stock Market is Up or Down

In advanced investment world today, investors now have the opportunity to assess the performance of the major stock market indexes doubled by using the comprehensive index mutual fund offerings of two families of mutual funds, Rydex and Profunds.
By using this strategy, investors can increase their return on the same issue of investment dollars and thus accelerate growth. Their portfolio
The Rydex and Profunds Families offer what are commonly known as enhanced index funds. As ordinary mutual funds, enhanced index funds invest in different underlying shares and major indexes such as the NASDAQ 100, Dow Jones Industrials and S & P 500. But they also invest in derivatives such as futures and Equity Index Swap Agreements to their efficiency and ensure gains or losses equal 200% of the underlying index.
Enhanced index fund investing requires a new strategy that can significantly increase your efficiency when used with proper money management and a robust trading system.
Enhanced Index Funds Explained
The two categories Enhanced Index Funds are commonly known as "bull" funds and "bear" or "short funds." When buying a bull fund, the investor takes a bullish view that the market is going to rise. When buying a bear fund, the investor to believe that the market will decline because acquire funds bear in value as the underlying index declines a position.
Enhanced index funds allows the investor to increase because of their ability to return 200% of the underlying movement of the index. Profits in both up and down markets
Therefore, they offer additional exposure to an index with less investment capital, so you can free up resources for other investments. While they can provide accelerated gains, they also generate accelerated losses if the investor on the wrong side of the market.
Potential benefits of Enhanced Index Funds
- Double the profits of the underlying index in both up and down markets
- More exposure to the market without increased investment
- Can be used to short the market, which can not be done with most other short vehicles in qualified retirement accounts
Potential disadvantages of Enhanced Index Funds
- Leverage will maximize losses if invested on the wrong side of the market
- Increased volatility due to derivatives
- May not be suitable for all investors
- Lack of flexibility can not be traded during trading day, end of day pricing
- Tracking error; enhanced index funds can vary from underlying benchmark and therefore may not be delivered to the underlying index 200% efficiency
Enhanced Index Funds are suitable for you?
Enhanced index funds are suitable for investors who seek an aggressive investment tool and want the potential benefits of the underlying index surpass.
They offer investors a greater exposure and potential profits without extra cash and so allow the investor to maximize returns.
Before using enhanced index funds, using the investor must be honest or her ability to accept determine the volatility and risk but can improved wisely and in conjunction with a proven trading system, index funds a valuable and profitable addition to your portfolio be.
Copyright 2006 Equitrend, Inc.

3 Big Lies

So much of what you hear in the financial press these days is so wrong that one most financial television and print should consider only strictly for entertainment purposes. In this article we examine more great is constantly cycled through the so-called "experts."
Big Lie # 1: Buy Large Cap Stocks that pay dividends
The idea here is that you buy "feel good stocks" such as Coke, Wal-Mart, and Microsoft. The theory is that if these companies can not make it, and that even if one can not appreciate their shares, you will earn dividends on the money. But here's the real story:
- If you are the owner of Microsoft, you have not made money for the last seven years. But you have a dividend of 0.32% earned per year.
- Your shares in WalMart have been dead for six years, but paid a 1.12% annual dividend.
- Coke lost your 20% from January 2005 until January 2006, but paid a dividend 2.3%.
- Perennial tough IBM lost more than 25% from 2001 to 2006 but eked 0.90% in dividends.
I could go on and on, but you get the idea.
You will probably never go broke investing in large-cap, but you'll never be rich, either. In fact, you will be much to do just to keep up with inflation pace.
And if you have decided to go with a large cap mutual fund, you have 5.8% annualized return over the past five-year average. Not bad, but not great. At 6% per year, even in a tax-deferred retirement plan, it will ask for your money to double. Approximately 12 years Taking inflation into account, it will take over 20 years to double in today's dollars your money!
Big Lie # 2: Buy Mutual Funds
Mutual funds are cash cows for the financial sector, but they are full of problems for investors like you and me.
Between December 31, 1992 and December 31, 2002, 10 years we have enjoyed one of the greatest bull markets in history, nearly 80% of all mutual funds underperformed the market, costing investors billions of dollars in unclaimed winnings.
And you get to pay for underperforming the market.
On top of the fees, you get capital gains tax and the occasional scandal. All in all, not a very good deal.
The other major problem with mutual funds is that just like the stock selection, it is difficult in the right sector at the right time.
In 2005, Latin America and natural resources the big winners of the year were. In the past three years have been the top performers Natural Resources, Latin America and India. Over five years, the big money made in Eastern Europe, Russia and Precious Metals. So unless you have a crystal ball and can pick exactly in each year, the right sector you will, by definition, have some or all of your money underperforming the market at all times.
The only exception in the mutual fund swamp, the group enhanced index funds offered by Rydex and Profunds. These provide an opportunity to the performance of the major stock market indexes, either long or short double, and can increase your profits if properly marketed with a proven trading system.
But, fortunately, there is a better way and this development, the mutual fund industry run really, really scared.
Exchange Traded Funds, or ETFs, first appeared about five years ago and today are to steal money hand over fist from traditional funds.
This asset class is growing nearly 300% per year and it is easy to see why.
Exchange Traded Funds offer higher performance by simply following a market like we ¡| ve already seen, 80% of mutual funds underperform the market so that ETFs are better performers right off the bat.
ETFs trade like stocks, their costs are much lower and they have zero scandals. On top of that, you can major market indexes or you can trade sectors, such as precious metals, healthcare or internationally. All in all, Exchange Traded Funds offer an excellent alternative to mutual funds and we recommend that ETFs are a part of the portfolio of each investor.
Big Lie # 3: Buy Bonds
There is nothing wrong with buying bonds, as long as you realize that they are not the safe haven of the financial press is to be them.
Sure, they are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, but they come with a host of hidden risks that should be considered by any investor, especially those in or near retirement.
The standard rule of thumb is that an investor should allocate its assets by subtracting his age from 100 and then to the mix of stocks and bonds to determine. In its portfolio using that number
For example, a 55-year-old investor from 100 and come with 45. Off his age Therefore, to distribute 55% in bonds and 45% in equities portfolio.
The theory is that the older you get, the less stock market exposure you should have, because you have less time to recover in case of a market drop would have. This is good advice if you're after a buy and hold plan.
However, the danger of this plan is that as you get more and more money to allocate to bonds, you become more vulnerable to inflation. In today's world where the average person can expect to live for 20 years or more in retirement, inflation, market risk is not your worst enemy.
10 Year U.S. Treasury Bonds currently supply about 4.4%, not great when you consider that the cost of living increased by 2.5% per year.
It will be a huge nest to participate in a livable retirement income at a fixed eggs to make 4.4% and in twenty years, inflation-adjusted bonds, your income will be reduced by more than 50%.
Another gruesome risk of bonds is interest rate risk. If interest rates rise bond prices fall, in other words, your nest egg falling in value when interest rates rise environment. That will not matter if you can hang on until the bond, but that could be ten, twenty or even thirty years from now.
What would happen if unexpected illness or financial forced you to cash in your bond before maturity? If interest rates have risen since you bought, you will lose money.
How safe is that?
The only sensible solution for an investor today is to protect, feed themselves and find a better way to his wealth and grow. There are a number of proven options available, but the absolute worst thing one can do is listen to the experts who tell you to "buy buy large caps, buy mutual funds and bonds."
Copyright 2006 Equitrend, Inc.

Ken Lay, Enron & ETFs

The painful story of Ken Lay and Enron offers us many lessons about managing and investing. My personal opinion is that Mr. Lay was a good man who got a little carried away and made a few key mistakes. He should be judged on his overall career as an innovative executive and generous contribution to his community and not just the mistakes that lead to the collapse of Enron.
I first met Ken Lay and Enron style of the company, while the United States to the management of the Asian Development Bank in Manila. Manila experienced severe blackouts and Enron won one of the many fast-track contracts offered by the Philippines government to generate the capacity to quickly add nice thick margins. During 1994-1995, I help Asian developing. Energy projects at Enron
At that time, Ken Lay and Enron were both rising stars and the darlings of the investment world.
Too often, investors forget that the most important factor to consider when evaluating a company is the quality and character of the management. You can get the best products, lucrative and profitable markets and the best balance, but if management fails the whole story and the share will crumble.
A related problem is the set-up of the board of directors of a company and whether it is independent and has strong oversight of management. Another important factor to consider is the culture of the company. His economic incentives offered to management and staff closely the interests of shareholders?
Finally, it is easy to understand the business and its operations and financial transparency, so that investors can evaluate. The value and profitability of the company
Unfortunately, Enron not all four tests. Let's briefly look at each failure.
First, when I was with Enron, Mr. Lay had a strong and very capable COO Rich Kinder who made sure the trains ran on time. It was an effective partnership. Ken Lay was Mr. Rich Kinder was Mr. Outside and Inside. But it's Child was not going to wait forever to CEO and apparently for personal reasons, Mr. Lay blocked his appointment as CEO, leading to his eventual departure to the highly successful pipeline company Kinder Morgan forms become. Eventually, Mr. Jeffrey Skilling was named CEO and while he is intelligent and hard drive, he missed the character, experience and managerial skills needed for the job. In hindsight, this would have been a red flag for investors. When Skilling abruptly left the company in 2001, Mr. Lay returned to the CEO position, apparently without sufficient knowledge of the details of the financial problems and mismanagement of Enron.
Second, Board of Directors of Enron was mostly allies and friends of Mr. Lay and inadequate supervision Enron management and operation. Shareholders should see that this was the case and demanded more say in the appointment of experienced and independent directors as a check on management.
Third, the culture of Enron was very short-term oriented. Substantial bonuses were linked to demanding, but short-term performance objectives that led to the employees to make shareholder value for long-term projects that use sometimes made no sense. My perception was that for many workers, Enron was a chance to try to earn a lot of money and then go do something else. The problem was they did not their entrepreneurial activities but rather money fund shareholders with their own money. CFO Andrew Fastow was just one example of the problem.
Finally Enron trading and so-called innovative financing techniques were so complex and opaque that even experienced Wall Street analysts could not figure out how or when Enron was making money. So when questions were raised about certain questionable financial transactions, investors lacked confidence to hang by the turbulence hard and ran for the exits at the same time. Investors were without even understanding its business and the risks inherent in its activities in Enron stock piled.
Well that's my opinion what went wrong with Enron and investors in Enron, but what does all this have to do with ETFs?
First, if Ken Lay had instead of such a high concentration of Enron stock in a margin account, a balanced global ETF portfolio he may have faired better in court. One of the main charge against him was that if the stock price fell, he sold Enron stock while he stated that he buys in public.
For investors, it is logical to ask how they can be expected that the quality of management, supervisory board, the culture and incentives for workers assess and understand all the fine print in the financial statements. The answer is that the vast majority of investors have neither the experience nor the time to do this.
What if instead of buying one too many Enron stock, would just use their energy spread over a basket of energy companies by buying an energy ETF, such as the S & P Global Energy (IXC) ETF investors? Even at its peak market capitalization, Enron would at best have been. 6-7% of the basket Even better if the investor has to lock in profits or limit losses. A trailing stop loss in place
If you have the time and inclination, go ahead and do some stock selection but keep the lessons of Enron and Ken Lay in mind and puts the core of your overall portfolio in ETFs.
Carl T. Delfeld President & Publisher Chartwell Partners Carl has over twenty years experience in the global investment business with a strong background in Asia.
Author of global investor primer "The New Global Investor"
President of global investment consulting firm Chartwell Partners
Publisher of the Chartwell Advisor ETF Report and Asia Pacific Growth
Columnist on global investing with Forbes Asia: "Global Gambits"
Former U.S. Representative to the Board of Directors of the Asian Development Bank
President of the global economic strategy think tank Chartwell America
Asian specialist with the U.S. Joint Economic Committee and the U.S. Treasury
Former member of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Committee USA
Former investment executive with Robert Baird & Company and UBS
Graduated from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy with economics scholarship from US-Japan Friendship Commission
Exchange student at Sophia University, Japan's Ministry of Education Fellow at Keio University

5 Tips To Guarantee Trading Success (1)

Do you have experience trading or even if you do not, here are some tips that I have learned from one of the roughest schools in life. Which school would that be? Why would the school of hard knocks. Yup, the lessons were painful and expensive, but got into the lesson very well. So hopefully these tips will save you the pain and financial lessons I had to endure.
1.Trading is simple, but it is not easy. If you see yourself having a future in this sector, forget about "hope" and stick to your stop loss.
2.When you open a trade, looking for signs that you were wrong. If you see them, then get out before you stop loss is executed.
3.Don opens a box just because it is cheap. The only reason to open a position if the underlying value looks like a decent move to make out.
4.good trading should be boring to do over and over again. Just the same If there's one thing I guarantee on the market, it's that 'thrill seekers' or adrenaline junkies get their accounts grounded in little bits and pieces.
5.The watershed when amateur traders turn into professional traders when they stop searching and hoping for the "next great technical indicator" and start managing their risk on each trade.
By Brian Lee
Learn how to make 100% annualized return!

How to Protect Yourself Against Penny Stock Scams

Many people have been subject to penny stocks scams. They hear about the next big hot penny stock in message boards, e-mails, faxes, and other people who claim that such and such penny stock will go through the roof. So they listen and put some money in the penny stock. Then, lo and behold, they see their investment crash and they wonder what went wrong. Then they go to other people's fault, when in fact, they have no one to blame but themselves. Here are three ways to protect against penny stock scams yourself.

1. Take information that you see on message boards with a grain of salt.
Message boards are a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they can be. Be a great source of information On the other hand, message boards to gnaw the beginners. Been fertile ground for the wolves These wolves are known as "pumpers". They will throw important sounding terminology at you and come across as to make sure that this is the next penny stock to invest in. Sometimes these "pumpers" are none other than those paid by the hyped penny stock company to artificially inflate the price Available through word of mouth. To use when making your final decision. Use extreme discretion when deciding what information
2. Ignore all mail, email, or fax a penny stock hypes.
A penny stock promoted through unsolicited e-mail, email, fax would label themselves as large red letters spelling SCAM. Do you know people who are all talk and no action? Penny stocks that promote themselves via spam are all talk and no action. The sole purpose of spending is to create the price of the penny stock blow. Artificial height Then the people who promote the stock will sell their shares at a profit thus driving the share price down so those who have recently invested in a negative loss. What makes the situation worse is that the same people who recently bought will hold in the hope of having the stock price to rise again, but 9.9 times out of 10, the stock price will continue to fall and they will suffer a greater loss.

3. Do your own research and personal responsibility.
If you happen to stumble on a penny stock that shows promise, do not take it at face value. Do your own research on this penny stock. What kind of services or products to the offer? How is their cash flow already in recent years? Do they have the bankruptcy recently? Take a look at their quarterly statements. In other words, you and you alone must take full responsibility for any action you take when it comes to money in penny stabbing to take supplies.
Follow these three guidelines and you will do well in protecting yourself against penny stock scams.

Investing in Stocks: To Hold or Sell Yesterday's Winner?

Here's the problem. You bought a stock many years ago that is now worth 10 times what you paid for, but in the last 5 years rate seems to be super glued to the wall. You've always been a proponent of "buy and hold" and this file seems to bear out the wisdom of that strategy. But now you're not sure - maybe it's time to move on to something else.
The question you keep asking yourself the same question thousands have asked before - when I know that this powerhouse has run out of gas and it's time to sell?
Here's needed some help with both sides of the coin:
1. "Buy and Hold" does not mean "till death do us. "Every investment strategy consists of three basic components:.. Buying, spacious, and selling Obviously, you buy and hold parts worked well, the stock was a good choice and has significantly increased in value, despite what probably some volatility along the way. It seems like you've gotten out of the "growth" phase of the Security With the lackluster performance of recent years, the stock may have matured and simply will not repeat its past performance as Paul Simon would say.. "Time to to sell, Nell. "
2. Is there a dividend yield is high enough to preserve the security? Figure out your dividend yield based on your original purchase price. If the 5% or more, which is not a bad annual return for a high security with a future appreciation potential. A company that has a record of dividend increases is more reason not to sell.
3. You know if the price decreases not above move, bragging of your average annual return. If you are up 200% on a stock of more than 5 years, boast an average 40% average annual return makes for a good story. If you're still an increase of 200% in 10 years, in all likelihood someone a better story.
4. Something overheated has a cooling off period. After a long run, the weekly closing price of a share sometimes within a few percentage points below the average volume. According to technical analysis, as this takes time, the stock can easily form a new base price. With an increase in the volume, the stock may "break out" and continue to rise. In the event that the share price falls (especially in the latter stage bases), since this is a danger sign could mean institutional money is moved away from the stock.
5. No matter how much you want, you can not change society change. Change in business fundamentals, management and business strategy can all affect the price of a stock. Sometimes it's a change for the better, sometimes not. You have to realize that nothing you can do will change this change. Sentimentality does not have much space in the stock market. If the foundations are not what they used to be, then that's the way it is. Look at yourself in the mirror.
6. Tell the truth - this is really all about the capital gains tax? We all like to play with ourselves, psychological games so do not be ashamed to admit it. If you add your net worth on paper, it looks higher than before tax after tax, right? Unless you plan to die with all your paper profit on the "step up" in basis to receive, recognize the difference between a game and reality.
If you're on the fence about whether to hold or sell, take the time to explore your options and decide your best course. Indecision will get you nowhere.
Glenn ("Chip") Dahlke, a senior contributor to the Living Trust Network, has 28 years in the investment business.
He is a Registered Representative of Linsco / Private Ledger and a principal with Dahlke Financial Group. He is licensed to securities transactions with persons who are residents of the following states: CA. CT, FL, GA, IL. MA, MD. ME, MI. NC, NH, NJ, NY.OR, PA, RI, VA, VT, WY.

Curb the Learning Curve and Develop Yourself Properly for the Share Market

"The market is a place to meet up with experience. Those with money people The people with experience get the money. And people with money get the experience.-Anon "
Below is the development path that I have advocated and seen to work successfully for more than a decade together.
Step 1:
Education on market share and strategies for investing The Safe Investing method is designed to provide a thorough grounding in market share principles and the development of successful investing habits. All data you need is included in this document. We recommend a thorough study of the material together with the completion of your personal investment as a first step.

Step 2:
Practice invest in simulation using historical data saratoga's Trade Simulator is designed to help you learn how to invest without using your own money. use Investing strategies and methods can be tried during different market conditions, such as downward trending markets (bear markets), or strong progress (bull markets) to invest capital to improve. A structured assessment process is included to help you identify problem areas which you can then work for better results. But you can also practice safe investing without software products through simple paper trading.
Step 3:
Practice invest in simulation using live data. This logical progression move very close to a live investing environment in which decisions are made in the simulation, but are carried out in real time using live data. This gives you the opportunity to assess how well your investing habits during simulation and how well you would perform in the real market developed.
Step 4:
Investing in the real market using your own funds (capital). Saratoga's Trade Simulator can be used to invest to support and follow your life your performance. The review process is as essential as ever and can be used to maintain and invest in live enhance your current performance. You must also continue to be used to continuously improve your with the simulation environment investing skills and test different scenarios or new investment approaches. As you should be able to see this is a logical and practical approach to investing market share. If you really take the time to implement this strategy, I have personally seen time and again that you will reap the benefits.
Phil Wengier, VIC, Australia
More details about Successful Investing can be found here Phil Wengier been successfully investing in the financial markets for over 30 years and is the owner of a number of companies. In particular, has Saratoga Pty Ltd on the Internet since 1996 helping many who want to discover how to invest.'re Safe and successful If you want to subscribe to my Savvy Investor newsletter click here

Part Five: The Lowdown on the Louisiana Energy Services Uranium Enrichment Facility

Who better than the LES puzzle then explain Jim Ferland? As president of Louisiana Energy Services, Ferland came on board nearly three years ago. At the time, the LES project was still in Tennessee, but quickly losing traction. Ferland admits the situation had gotten so bad in Tennessee that his management team had to look elsewhere.
First, we wanted to clarify exactly who is the owner of LES. Conflicting news, found in the news after LES was awarded the first NRC license for a nuclear facility in almost thirty years, confused us. Ferland straightened us at this point, too. "LES is incorporated in Delaware. It is a limited partnership. I'll give you a quick overview of the property. It's confusing." Six months ago, Westinghouse Electric owned 24.5 percent of the LES. British Nuclear Fuels, which owns a one-third stake in Urenco, Westinghouse property. On 3 March this year, Urenco bought Westinghouse's minority interest in LES.
Wait, it gets even more confusing. "Back in the original LES, which was back in Louisiana in the early 1990s, the utilities had an equity share in that time," Ferland explained. "When the Urenco the backup, project grabbed for it again in 2002, the utilities tagged along. The utilities, though, does not have an equity ownership share." According Ferland, Urenco bought the three U.S. utilities - Entergy, Exelon and Duke - go in exchange for some money and more cash advance. "The only thing that happens is the tool deserves the rest of their money back if LES meets certain milestones going forward," said Ferland. "One of the milestones was (realized) the day LES received the NRC license. Since 2002 these three programs did not manage to say and no equity participation. They just had some rights to future cash flows, depending on whether LES was successful or not. Essentially, we pay the utilities return for the investment they put into the early 1990s. "
The result is simple. Louisiana Energy Services is a wholly owned subsidiary of Urenco Ltd. But again, get ready for a tad more confusion about the ownership. Issue
Urenco's UK partner wants to sell. His third interest in the company We asked if perhaps Ferland British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) was unhappy with the New Mexico enrichment facility. "I do not think so," he replied. "This is my personal opinion, because I'm certainly not a member of the management of BNFL. BNFL is looking to get out of nuclear activities entirely. Recognize that BNFL is a government-owned entity. I think the government has decided that they do not need to be in the nuclear business. They have done many things. They are in the process of closing the transaction of sale of Westinghouse. Their nuclear decommissioning group is offered for sale. The last major piece of BNFL nuclear industry is one-third owned by them in Urenco. course, given that they have the sales of the other two, they divest any interest owned piece too. "
Who will ultimately have BNFL, and thus a third owner of Urenco an owner of the New Mexico enrichment facility become, and indirectly? Last week, the London Daily Telegraph reported the French nuclear firm, EDF, BNFL had offered to buy the game for about £ sterling 2000000000. EDF spokesman denied an offer had done. According to Reuters, would both German and Dutch stakeholders oppose participation of EDF.
This latest wrinkle is just one in another of several disturbing episodes as LES moves forward in operations. We spoke with Ferland about the cost of environmental racism in Louisiana, where her long journey LES first began to obtain. An NRC license As with every question and concern we expressed Ferland not hesitate or back down, but instead methodically answered, "Urenco and its partners begin the permitting process for LES around 1990. Bowl in 1997, they still lack the NRC license . Seven years pursuing a license is a long time. There were a variety of topics. One of them was environmental justice. "
Ferland had not yet arrived at the time, but he had studied the cost. "Here's my take on why they took so long," he began. "Environmental justice, at that time, was a relatively new concept. There were not many rules or regulations in place on how to accept or environmental racism was not going on. They spent a long time arguing back and forth about how to make that decision. How do you do those calculations? "
So what happened? "It is my understanding, at the end of it all, was to be in the clear on that particular subject. LES found" Why did it take so long and why the unusual accusation? "I think it was," Ferland began, but paused. "Anti-nuclear opponents will do what they can to slow the permitting process. It was a successful attempt by the anti-nuclear people to put huge delay in the authorization process to the point where the owner finally walked away."
Finally, how did Louisiana Energy Services end up in New Mexico? Abandoning the project in Louisiana, the company moved to Tennessee. Some report the locals chased LES from the state. Ferland surprised us with his answer, "LES never submitted the license application for the NRC."
But what is the real story here? "I will be very blunt about it," Ferland warned us. "The management had lost credibility with the local population in Tennessee. A company like ours doing a project like this, even though it is extremely safe and extremely environmentally friendly, it is a nuclear project." And this is advice to anyone hoping to cash in on the nuclear renaissance, "And if you do not have the credibility and the trust of the public, in all honesty, you can not continue with the project." Ferland cleared the air, "Management had some problems in the way they the public and the press in Tennessee which lose their credibility, and probably rightly to be addressed." The situation was so bad gone, Ferland, "We could not turn that around."
Based on our interviews with state senators and representatives, New Mexico's response was magical compared to what LES endured for the past 16 years. "Marshall Cohen and his team did a very good job in New Mexico," explained Ferland. "We have, as it is done well to sell. Relatively good project we take people to the operational enrichment facility in Europe, where we are seeing being copied." LES did exactly that. We interviewed New Mexico State Senators Leavell and Kernan, who both gave their blessing Urenco Almelo facility. "It is ultra clean, ultra high tech and has a very good environmental record for as long as it has been in existence, which is 25-plus years." Ferland said with steel in his voice, "If you do it right, it is to sell a fairly simple project and if you do it wrong, you can quickly drive it into the ditch."
CONCLUSION
The LES project went along the "selling phase." Groundbreaking is in late August. Ferland told us the construction began this past week. LES will Lea County, New Mexico and Andrews County, Texas with more that 800 construction jobs to build the National Enrichment Facility (NEF). "We expect the first cascade to go online in late 2008," said Ferland. Because this is a modular design, more cascades will go online by 2013, when the plant is at full strength.
"We hope to be delivered in early 2009, our first product," he added. This will be a relatively small amount. "Marge, we come up with roughly 20 percent of our output per year," explained Ferland. This comes to about 600,000 SWU (separative work units).
It takes about 10 pounds of U3O8, which provide tools for the enrichment facility, to create a SWU. "It's a 3 million SWU facility," Ferland told us. Three million SWU is about 25 percent of U.S. demand, he added.
From all indications, it Ferland runs a tight ship. Urenco seems to be behind this persistent but sober corporate executive firmly. He knows how to run this business he built his team, and they have created a miracle in New Mexico - the first step in the Nuclear Renaissance New Mexico.
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc. All rights reserved.

Can Annuities Help You?

Are you starting to think about your financial stability for you and your partner are future? Maybe you're starting to wonder how you can support during your retirement years? Yourself If so, then maybe it's time you took a look at annuities and see if they have the answer to your problems.
So what is an annuity and who do you buy them? Well, annuities are usually sold by insurance companies. There are many types of annuities are available and knowing which is the right one for you can be difficult. With so many different annuity plans, it is easy to feel confused and a bit lost! Before committing yourself to an annuity contract, you should look to consult with your financial advisor, he will identify your personal circumstances and help you find the right annuity plan for you.
Ok, so what is an annuity you ask! Well, to put it simply, an annuity is basically a contract between you and the insurance company. Do you agree with the insurance company pays a lump sum of money and the insurance company invests that money and agree to pay you interest on that amount over a number of years. To put it simply, an annuity is a loan. Of course, this is just a simple explanation and details and conditions will vary depending on the type of annuity you do take.
When choosing a type of annuity, you also decide on a certain amount of risk you are willing to take. A fixed rate is one of the safest to sign up for, but it is not as rewarding as some of the other annuities. One of the more riskier available is the 'variable annuity. You can get some excellent rates make money with this, but there is also the potential danger of losing all the money you have invested if the money is not invested wisely. Again, your financial adviser will help to explain the best options and advise you where to look to invest you money.
When signing an annuity, you are signing a contract, a contract that is usually not easy to come out! So, be careful. Never sign to examine the annuity an annuity without fully sign up for and also the insurance company that you will be dealing with. You should never feel put under pressure about signing an annuity contract immediately. If they are under pressure to do this, then just walk! Your way This is your long-term future is at stake! Take a few days, talk to your partner and you're financial advisor.
Annuities are not for everyone. They can be confusing and you are interested in annuities, should be thoroughly investigated! Or an annuity is right for you depends on your personal circumstances. Many find them useful and rewarding, but again, many find themselves stuck in a contract that they are fighting to get out of. So talk to your advisor and see if an annuity is the answer for you.

Part One: The Lowdown on the Louisiana Energy Services Uranium Enrichment Facility

Leave no stone unturned. That's how professionals perform a program to a project. The reversal of Louisiana Energy Services (LES) is nothing short of spectacular. Resurrected from the dead, the LES enrichment facility fast forward. After being shunned by two states, in a grueling saga takes fifteen years, LES finally found a home in New Mexico for its uranium enrichment plant. Our brief encounter with LES president Jim Ferland and his right hand, Marshall Cohen, vice president of Communications, they showed his serious players with a no-nonsense approach to making the LES uranium enrichment facility operational. How did we come to this conclusion? It began with a story that we wrote.
While on vacation in Maine, an alert Marshall Cohen called offices StockInterview's, within hours of the publication of our Market Outlook Journal article entitled "Will Cameco Supply the Uranium for New Mexico Proposed Enrichment Facility" He believed that we wrong the story? and quickly scheduled an afternoon interview with Jim Ferland, President of LES to clarify the matter. It might even have been before, but Mr. Ferland was in a plane at the time.
When we finally spoke, we did not mince words that Thursday afternoon. Ferland wanted to make clear that there is no secret deal between Cameco and LES. "Cameco thought about investing in the project, at one time," Ferland explained. "Cameco had a memorandum to basically investigate whether it makes sense to invest, and chose not to." Yet Ferland agreed Canada would be the likely source of the uranium, "The majority of the uranium is mined from Canada or Australia." He admitted, "I do not know exactly where it is going to come from, I'm just guessing, because obviously no use to us all make this point, most of which came from Canada or (ConverDyne, Illinois) Metropolis facility. "
Other eye fell on our article. Julian Steyn, head of the DC-based Energy Resources International and co-author of U.S. Senator Pete Domenici's book, "A Brighter Tomorrow: Fulfilling the promise of nuclear energy," fired us an e-mail he wrote. "It uranium enriched in the LES Lea County plant will be provided by the plant's utility customers, all of whom are expected to be U.S. utilities. It will be the U.S. utilities that enter into supply arrangements strictly on the basis of commercial considerations. "Steyn has noted," Yes, Cameco will undoubtedly be one of the producers, but so will Hydro Resources (a subsidiary of Uranium Resources, Inc.). "Steyn not believe that there is no unusual offers cutting between Cameco and LES.
Other potential producers may also Strathmore Minerals, Energy Metals Corporation and UR Energy. They are aggressively moving forward with their In Situ Recovery operations in New Mexico, Wyoming, and / or Texas. Hydro Resources (HRI) President Craig Bartels told us, "With so much uranium left in northwestern New Mexico, we certainly hope that it helps supply LES." HRI's In Situ Recovery (ISR) have undergone intense regulatory controls, uranium projects for many years. As was found with the LES, projects HRI's have also been found safe for the environment. Bartels wholeheartedly endorsed the LES project, says: "It is not only good for New Mexico, but also for the United States."
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc. All rights reserved.

Part Four: The Lowdown on the Louisiana Energy Services Uranium Enrichment Facility

After the uranium is enriched, about 90 percent waste. "Initially, it will be stored on site in the form of depleted UF6", Ferland explained. "Of course, the majority of the U-235 will be taken from the tailings at that point. Certainly, there will be a little about." But where will the tailings go? Ferland has a beat not skip in his reply, "We have two options for removing the tails. Wherever we go right this minute, and I would expect this is where we will end up, is we will have a private deco version facility to build. Or someone else will build a private party for us. "
And who would deco version facility to build? "To the extent that builds and operates the plant, it would be us or someone else," Ferland said. "We have a memorandum of understanding in place with Areva, which would allow us access to their technology. They have a current version deco factory in France that we could choose to copy well." According to Ferland, the plant will not be built in New Mexico, "Part of the settlement agreement with Governor Richardson and (New Mexico) Attorney General Madrid was we agreed not to build. Deco version a factory in the state"
Ferland suggested the plant could be in Texas, but perhaps elsewhere. He believes it can build to take a few years and would cost between $ 100 and $ 200 million to build. Ferland added: "It would create between 50 and 80 new jobs." Ferland said LES would the permitting process for the deco version plants begin in the next few years. "You have to go through the entire NRC licensing process to build one of those," he noted. "We're looking at two to three years, approximately. And then we start building and begin to work at that facility. That is where we are headed with deco version." Which meshes with operational plans enrichment facility. "I would not be surprised to see within a year or two after we reach full capacity (with the enrichment facility) online version deco plants" Ferland said.
Not to provide a more accurate predictions about how long the tailings remain in storage in New Mexico, the LES enrichment facility, our Ferland suggested some possible destinations for the waste, "You just send that to any of a variety of low- level landfills across the country. The closest is in Utah. There may be a day in Texas in Waste Control Specialists (WCS) facility. They are in the process of getting a license. "Will the deco version factory are located in Texas? "It would be good," he replied. "The facility is just a few miles from our site. Inherently, it makes sense. The missing link is of course that the WCS facility is not licensed today."
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc. All rights reserved.