Advisory Services

Several times a month I asked by various market touts who have a newsletter service, faxes or e-mails they are willing to send me to make me rich. That is certainly nice of them.
The first thing that pops into my head is If this system is so good why are they willing to share it with the small sum of $ 350 or $ 19.95 per month or other cheap price. Of course, some of them will move to the point and increase that number right front, but not worry - it is sold with a money back guarantee! Has to cover any losses that guarantee I can go up if I rub the magic lantern and trade what the spirit says? I do not think so.
Should anyone desire to have his toe into the water here are some questions that are a must for each consultant:
1. The figures shown actual transactions or this hypothetical? If the hypothetical stop there. Total BS. Accept only the actual trading numbers.
2. What is the minimum size necessary to take into take all signals?
3. His stop loss orders in the service? Never buy each tout sheet that does not have a built- protection.
4. Is slippage and commission came in?
5. If all transactions were made for the past year what was the basic amount and the amount the bill at the end of the year? Than subtraction slippage and commission.
6. What was the biggest loss?
7. What was the largest contiguous drawdown (Loss)?
8. How many winning trades? And average profit?
9. How many losing trades? And average loss?
10. Are they willing to have a few clients who refer uses your method with their permission, of course? (Get references.)
It is my experience that traders will not get an answer or maybe get a standard letter say their method is proprietary information and can not be distributed. Nonsense. We know where You can put this letter.
Ask to see their Model account. Surprisingly the Securities and Exchange Commission require these vendors maintain such account. I would like to see such a scheme adopted, far fewer of these would methods and systems sold most would go bankrupt.
If they can prove their method satisfaction of the trader that he would like to try their system, but if the buyer does not plan to follow each trade as described in the method then it should not be bought. Do not try to outsmart the system.
Before an investor sends money they documentation to prove exactly what they are sell.

Managing Risk & Shares

Managing Risk
Every deal, trade, investment or business should be conducted on the basis of a strictly enforced limit risk. That is, you just need to be willing to lose andlimited a fixed amount of money on the investment. You have no control over what the market will do, you have no control over the share price. However, Strange is one of the few factors completely in your control is how much you are willing to lose.
Each time money is invested in a stock, the risk being taken over by that investment action to be identified before the investment is made. Once the risk amount is determined, the next decision is to decide on the method of risk that will be used as part of the investment. Saratoga's Safe Investing Method (TM) uses three alternative methods of risk management.
Each investment has the potential for profit of several times the risk. A strict application of this rule for each investment, the total profit of more than losing end.
You never know if an investment share (or other investment) will benefit when you enter into. Any investment you take therefore a risk-to-reward ratio of less than 1 to 2. Then, even if only half of your investments are winners, you must earn money. It is a good practice to have a minimum of 1 to 3 risk-to-reward ratio target.
Managing money Diversification
There should be a spread of investments (or transactions or deals) be to ensure a profit. If you knew what specific investment or share the best returns in the future, then you have all your money in just that one investment and wait for the return. Unfortunately, no one knows the future, so putting all your eggs in one basket is a very high risk strategy.
Every deal, trade or investment may fail completely. Occasional wants. Rarely will a blue chip company goes bankrupt. These factors are not known up-front at the time of investment. If they were, you would not make that investment.
The warranty for this contingency is to invest in an investment. Only a small percentage of your assets This is called diversification. For example, suppose you had ten different investments each of equal value, and one of them failed completely, then at worst you only lost 10% of your assets. It is likely that you will make an overall positive return for the year, despite this major failure as the other 90% of your assets continues to work for you.
Phil Wengier, VIC, Australia
More details about Successful Investing can be found here Phil Wengier been successfully investing in the financial markets for over 30 years and is the owner of a number of companies. In particular, has Saratoga Pty Ltd on the Internet since 1996 helping many who want to discover how to invest.'re Safe and successful If you want to subscribe to my Savvy Investor newsletter click here

Profit Targets... Important Or A Really Bad Idea?

Predictable vs. Unpredictable?
Many traders and investors goals. Can be a goal to achieve a 15% profit annually. Typical
Although it is quite clear that the markets can not be depended upon for a "constant" rate of return, the question is, is it even a good idea to ask? Such targets
Would you rather have a stable yield of 15%, 15%, 15% in the next three years? Or an unpredictable return with potential drawdowns, say, -5%, +50%, +20%.
Assuming that the goal of 15% set for the next three years and you have an investment of $ 1,000 to start, 15%, 15%, 15% means in three years your investment would be worth $ 1,520.
But what about the unpredictable returns? -5%, +50%, +20% In three years will increase to $ 1710, your initial investment even if you lose your money. Throughout the first year spent
Catch A Trend, Let It Ride!
Market timers using trend following strategies as FibTimer.com do not want to try and achieve or force to meet the results for a set profit target.
For example, if we set a profit target of 15% and left one of the incredibly profitable short trades in the 2000-2002 bear market, we have significantly reduced our realized gains. Why join a trend at 15% and then sit on the sidelines watching the market go up another 60% or 70%.
In fact, we have no profit targets. Our goal is to make each tradable trend, and if we do, to make it as far as we can to close that carry trade capture.
This means that if there are no trends, we will not gain or lose any small. But it also means that when the market does trend, and history shows that the trends in the markets 80% of the time or better, we have to drive our earnings and take every piece of the profits.
Each Trend Trading
A problem encountered here at FibTimer, and we expect all faced timing services, the pressure felt by nervous subscribers. Believe us when we say that it is a problem. We read and answer all emails.
But here is our response to nervous subscribers. If we reduce the risk and reduce the volatility in our strategies, in order to minimize contractions (during those times when they occur), we also have a lower return in time!
There is no way to identify trends act without the risk that the current trend may be a false one. Loss risk used FibTimer borders and protects the capital, but sometimes, losses are inevitable.
By trading every trend, we are sure that we will make on board any money upfront, and any money making decline (bearish trades), that the future will bring. But you have to be around for the money making trend, and you have to trade, to realize when we took them. Profits
Lessons of history
Remember the crushing loss of 2000-2002. The Nasdaq fell 80% and the S & P 500 lost 50%. It would be (from the lows) to take to achieve. Its old highs again the Nasdaq 2.25% 100 years of annual profits Or to be more realistic would take the profit over 6 years of 30% per year to reach. To its old highs again No losses allowed!
What do you think the chances of this happening? It is now 2006 and we are nowhere near achieving it. But our aggressive strategies tagged 100% profit in those years.
It is important to approach you. Timing with this in mind If you're a month and then stop because you no profit, you are only fooling yourself. We will continue to make a profit over the years. Because we trade "all" trends that we "know" future profits will be realized. Years of experience and hundreds of years of market history behind us.
Be patient, follow the buy and sell signals, and the profits of the next big trend are yours. We do not know when the next trend will start. We do not know whether it will be to the upside or to the downside. While we try to look at the future in our weekly analysis sections, no matter what, we will exchange the trends. That is the key to success.

Personal Finance - A Quick Introduction to Three Money Generating Instruments

Most people when asked today are either floundering in debt or asset rich and cash poor. This is because most of the funds and the plans that people invest in are usually capital appreciation instruments. This means you money due to the difference in the buying and selling price of the instrument can make. So while you are invested in instruments, not much to do except dividends, either once or twice a year spent.
This article will also introduce you to three common cash-generating tools that can help such cash for your investment portfolio to generate.
REITs also known as Real Estate Investment Trusts are basically instruments that allow individuals to get out of the rental income from the premises after the management companies deduct their operating costs to manage the properties. A stream of income Yields may vary between classes of objects and you buy the shares of REITs and part of the rental income. Spend time looking at the return of the REIT and its properties portfolio to decide whether the REIT is for you to invest in. Avoid REITs with a high management fees since its not in your best interest.
Forex Managed Accounts are another income stream if you are not in the Forex Trading yourself. Some banks and large financial institutions have Forex traders trading on your behalf and they can give you every month certain fixed monthly returns. Look for companies that have good money management strategies and look before investing in these companies. Return to some of their But that said in Forex risk comes with great reward so consider Forex Managed Accounts a possible alternative investment.
Oil Trusts work as real estate investment trusts, except that the amount you get depends on the price of oil. You are basically sharing the oil proceeds with the oilfield and every month they calculate the price of oil sold and you are a part of that. This means that you will earn in a month in which the oil price is high. More So the best time to invest in these more exotic investments if the price of oil is low and you can buy at a lower price. More shares of the oil field
Finally, are not all gloom and invest in the country. Spend some time searching and shopping around for cash-generating investment to balance your investment money from so you will not end asset rich and income poor. Even better, take your capital gained from your other instruments and insert it into real good of your own and generate even more money to spend each month. Take massive action today and achieve your financial future sooner rather than later!
Copyright © 2006 Joel Teo. All rights reserved. (You can use this product with the following author information with live links only publish in its entirety.)

How To Manage Your Credit Card and Build an Income Stream

Discipline yourself and save on your costs to only a tenth of your income while at the same time finding a company that money to work for you and multiply on a continuous basis. You must be careful to invest in a secure business operations that will not disappoint your objective. Charge your credit card, but use it wisely so you do not always fall in debit.
It gives you confidence to a loaded credit card, just like putting money in your wallet, but it really is a loss of money, money that you just love to give away for one reason or another. Sooner or later you have to spend. All or part of the money Spent. So it is very necessary to have a source of recurring revenue not only to recharge your credit card, but to act as a money-bearing tree for you as a source of wealth as opposed to wages.
The big question is how do you make your money multiply or how do you plant a money tree, so that you can have in order to spend wisely if you should decide more.
Have you ever considered what it is that banks do to have much money? The answer is simple. Taking banks for safekeeping deposits and collect interest on them for their services, but the real source of bank profits do not come from the small interests they collect, but generated from the multiplier effect where the interests accruing be lent to the banks to borrowers who in turn pay interests of the banks for loans. The income from this source is continuous for each bank, because lending money to customers is an on-going business for banks.
As a bank attracts interests of its customers it gives the same to other eager customers and the flow of interest for the bank is golden and huge, not only increasing the capital base of the bank, but always keeping the bank earning power on the increase. Credit card companies also get rich collection of small interests they invest wisely in turn for the same multiplier discussed above.
Also imagine how much you will be if you had enrolled in a leading multi level marketing company where you now have a huge network of lines down to who make the purchases they have ever made your bonus and your parents at birth it now still make it.
Now it should be clear that money is to be used other than wealth. Wealth is better described as the total source of income that is constantly flowing into your account so that your expenses never catches up with it and put it. This is the type of income everyone should strive for, an income that does not stop because you are ill, on holiday or in other activities of life.
So think about an investment that will without fail generating a persistent and significant revenue and income stream as do interest rates for credit card companies and banks. Few stable income from a particular investment will quickly become a huge reservoir of cash ... and if you are able to make your status as a rich person multiple income streams eventually realized sooner than later.
I have spent my years in considerable amount of money. Now think how rich I would be if I basically I preach here by just investing a tenth of all the millions who have spent so far, in a company or companies that bring back continuously had applied to me no mater how little today , return on my investment.
The incremental effect on money invested wisely so dramatic, even when the revenue comes in drips.
Remember to wisely invest all, not all investments lead to profits. Men have lost huge sums of money invested in the business. Invest your penny wise and bear pounds quickly.
Paid employment provide some short-term income, but because you were appointed the tendency is that you will be disappointed for some reason one day. Think about it and make an investment that will continuously funnel income on your way. A stitch in time saves enough.

Trade Association Forecasts U.S. Uranium Industry to Produce 20 Million Pounds by 2012

The Uranium Producers of America (UPA) was formed over twenty years ago. Over the years, this professional association worked with Congress and state legislators to help improve the front-end of the fuel cycle: uranium mining. Today, it is re-energized with new members and to contribute to the U.S. uranium mining sector rebuild with this task. We spoke to Jon Indall, a lawyer based in Santa Fe, New Mexico, which serves as the Executive Director of the UPA.
Uranium Producers of America members include International Uranium Corporation, power resources, Uranium Resources, Cotter Corporation, Energy Metals Corporation, Mestena Uranium, U.S. Energy, Laramide Resources, Strathmore Minerals, Uranium Energy and Neutron Energy.
StockInterview: What is the function of the Uranium Producers of America (UPA)?
Jon Indall: Uranium Producers of America is a professional association, originally founded in 1985 to promote the viability of the domestic uranium industry.
StockInterview: How did the UPA association created?
Jon Indall: The UPA was initially founded by the great American producers such as Kerr McGee, Homestake, United Nuclear, Rocky Mountain Energy, Union Carbide, Atlas, and Pathfinder. The main operating companies decided to form to focus on specific uranium viability issues. Their own group
StockInterview: How does the UPA differ from the National Mining Association regarding the uranium industry?
Jon Indall: Over the years the UPA was sort of an institution lobbying for the domestic industry and the viability handled such issues. The National Mining Association has a uranium environmental subcommittee. The NMA is more involved in the regulatory aspect, but we work together and have a good relationship. There is certainly an overlap between the members of each group, but our cargo has been more on the viability aspect.
StockInterview: How do you promote the viability of the domestic uranium industry?
Jon Indall: Our agenda is twofold. We want to continue to promote. Viability of uranium production in the United States In that spirit, we have met with the Department of Energy (DOE) to explain what is going on in the field. We let them know that active companies pursuing mining, acquiring properties, doing the exploration and development, and so on. We are also urging DOE not to do something that affects the market.
StockInterview: How could the Department of Energy affect the uranium market?
Jon Indall: The Department of Energy is sitting on a lot of inventory. We DO want to be in the way they use that material wisely. There is a very solid opportunity, in our opinion, going a few years, there is a gap between available supply and demand. Decreases the secondary market. We want to keep DOE. Their material against If there is a shortage, they can ride to the rescue, and the reactors will not go cold.
StockInterview: Are the utilities going to get back into the sector domestic uranium for their nuclear reactors provide sufficient uranium available?
Jon Indall: In the 1970s, when we first tree, domestic utilities were out making deals with producers. They were to invest in projects and things of that nature. Actively I do not think that will happen this year or next year. But a few years when things really tighten up, you could see that. Down the line,
Stock Interview: Where do the U.S. utilities are related to a domestic uranium industry?
Jon Indall: In the late 1980s and early 1990s, I think the utilities saw Canada as such a big production center, they lost interest in the domestic producers. They were not too concerned about having enough fuel coming in.
StockInterview: But, the industry has not changed in the past few years, as the spot price of uranium has risen?
Jon Indall: If you can see, with the impetus that is going on in Asia and all reactors under construction or planned, the press and everything else to read, I think the utilities have to understand that supply is something they should pay attention to. It is to talk to the utilities a little more seriously on our agenda. Even though you can get this stuff from other places, it's nice to have a local producer. It's pretty obvious this industry in the next four to five years, could produce in the range of 20 million pounds.
StockInterview: Do you believe that the domestic uranium industry can produce 20 million pounds in the next four to five years?
Jon Indall: Conservative, five to six years, but perhaps even earlier. Well, let me put it this way: We produce about 3 million pounds now. That is an increase of two. I could be off by a factor of a few hundred thousand. Power Resources produces about 2 million pounds. With the Uranium Resources production that has come up in Texas, and Mestena, you have about a million pounds or so. IUS has just announced that they are going to produce 3.5 million pounds, I think the next two years. Part of that material they clean up for DOE, but it is still in production. All the UPA members have plans to put into production at some point.
Stock Interview: Yes, but not take 5-11 years to get production going?
Jon Indall: I think eleven years is too far away. I think that if the companies can come up with it, you have four or five In Situ Recovery (ISR) activities to the production of a £ 2 million each. And then maybe somebody gets a conventional resume, just like me here IUS does. I can not tell you the exact number, but I think you will see increased production, assuming that the price continues to rise or stabilize.
StockInterview: How are the uranium companies are moving quickly?
Jon Indall: I think a lot of it, in my mind, is how well the regulatory community accepts what these guys are trying to do. My impression is - and this is just me talking - that many of the communities where this activity is carried out before, are not averse to see again. It does a good job and stuff. Many of these communities are kind of depressed communities. For example, in New Mexico, McKinley County is one of the lowest counties in the state economically. I think the average man would welcome the opportunity to. Seeing some good paying jobs there
StockInterview: How well would the regulatory community in New Mexico react?
Jon Indall: I recently met with the New Mexico Mining Minerals Division. As we passed the New Mexico Mining Act in 1993, no one allowed my in New Mexico. We talked about how we were going to do this. Obviously it is not going to happen tomorrow.
StockInterview: What about senior government officials, including the governor of New Mexico?
Jon Indall: I can tell you the New Mexico governor was very positive about the uranium miners when he was in Congress. He introduced legislation to support our efforts in those days, and some of it he did on his own. He has a great ability to govern, and I think he's looking for jobs. I think if we can show that we can do this better than we did in the past him then he will be supportive. That is my hope.
StockInterview: Will the big oil and mining companies to return to the uranium industry back?
Jon Indall: I do not anticipate the major oil companies again for some time. BHP Billiton initially said, "We have no interest in uranium mining in New Mexico." Then she turned around and bought the largest building in Australia. Now I BHP's hard to look at their new activities Mexico understand. So you might see some of the major mining companies involved.
StockInterview: Who will build the domestic uranium industry?
Jon Indall: I think it might be more entrepreneurial, that was the way it started in the 1950s. The early producers, with the exception of Kerr McGee, were individuals - Charlie Stone, Dick Bokum, and Cotter Ferguson in Wyoming. They were the people who really got this industry and go with AEC assistance. I'm not sure of the oil companies that are critical, but I would like to see get utilities in the mix. I guess it all depends on how supply and demand is observed.
StockInterview: How should the major producers of uranium, such as Cameco or BHP, deal with the consequences of a potential supply shortage for U.S. utilities?
Jon Indall: BHP and Cameco are aggressively trying to increase their production. They should not be doing that if they do not think there was a market for it. The U.S. market and the U.S. government are so important to the health of all providers, in my opinion, because our government to help more and the injury to the domestic and global production than did. Every other entity I think foreign producers wise to recognize that having a viable U.S. industry, which senators and congressmen care about, because they create jobs and income in their states, is not a bad thing. I think it keeps DOE honest. For me, if I were in Canada, this would be something I could look at his.
StockInterview: What should U.S. utilities have to look at, with respect to the supply picture?
Jon Indall: You have the Russians announce they do not intend to proceed with the HEU agreement after 2013. It is my understanding they are looking to beef supply for themselves. With the tools, I think it's kind of 'wait and see' at this time. I think they're looking at this from the big picture. I think the nuclear for them increasingly clear to play an increasing role. Global warming is really driving many boats here, and I think they realize there must be a real active nuclear power production increase.
StockInterview: How are things different now for the Uranium Producers of America compared to the early days in the 1980s?
Jon Indall: At present, it is a very different atmosphere than it was in 1985. The market went down quickly in 1985. Everyone was kind of fighting for their existence. We pleaded our case is that this industry was created by the government - the government did things that really screwed up. I think, now, we do not ask for so much. We are basically asking for the status quo. We do not want the government to do something that negatively affect the price. Let the price work itself out. Let's start with the production of uranium which has some cost implications. The price and the cost of having a relationship. From about 1985, they did not.
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc. All rights reserved.